The cost of not investing in cyber resilience

By
Ana Carolina Gamma.
September 12, 2025
5 min read
Compartilhe
Imagem de smartphone com alerta de 'Security Breach' indicando ameaça cibernética e necessidade de gestão de crise tecnológica

What was once seen as a point risk is now a statistical certainty: the question is not seyour company will be attacked, but whene how she will react.

In this context, a cyber resilienceis positioned as a strategic differential. Much more than protecting systems, it is about ensuring that the organization continues to operate in the face of crises, be they ransomware attacks, technical failures or natural events.


The Price of Ignoring Cybersecurity

According to IBM, the average cost of a data breach in 2021 exceeded $4,2 million. And it's not just financial loss. Operational losses, reputational impacts and regulatory penalties can compromise an entire value chain.

Neglecting cyber resilience is assuming an invisible and progressive cost. Thus, the absence of robust processes, continuous monitoring practices and contingency plans makes the organization hostage to inevitable incidents, with a direct impact on market confidence.


Cyber Resilience and Continuity

Resilience is not synonymous with total armor. It is the ability to maintain essential operations even when something goes wrong. It involves business continuity, rapid recovery and, above all, the ability to absorb impacts without destabilizing the entire organization.

Implementing cyber resilience requires an integrated strategy, combining risk management, visibility over critical infrastructure and well-defined response processes. Instead of acting only in prevention, resilient companies develop dynamic responsesfor an unstable world.


Reputation, trust and compliance: the invisible pillars at risk

In regulated markets such as financial, health or telecommunications, security failures are not only inconveniences, they are potential regulatory violations. Failure to comply with standards such as ISO 27001, PCI DSS or even national legislation can lead to severe penalties and loss of licenses.

In addition, trust is an intangible asset, but with direct commercial value. Customers, investors and partners demand transparency, accountability and commitment to good data protection practices. An organization that demonstrates control and maturity gains competitive advantage and strengthens its reputation in the ecosystem.


Three types of controls that every organization needs to master

To be resilient, a company needs to balance three main axes of control:

  • Preventive controls: focused on preventing the occurrence of incidents, such as access policies, firewalls and constant updates.
  • Investigative controls: focused on the detection of anomalous behaviors, vulnerabilities and attack attempts in real time.
  • Corrective Controls: triggered after an incident, with clear protocols for containment, remediation and recovery of environments.

This technical balance is what allows an adaptive response vision, making security a living asset and not an audit document.


The cost of not acting is always greater than the preventive investment

Companies mature in resilience do not expect the incident to happen to react. They monitor indicators, simulate crisis scenarios, train times and operate with security governance aligned with business strategy.

More than mitigating damage, leaders in resilience extract value from stability, maintaining ongoing processes, active contracts and preserved reputation, even in the midst of chaos.

While many companies are still debating whether or not to invest in resilience, others are already becoming benchmarks in continuity, security and reliability. The choice between reacting or anticipating is what separates those who survive from those who lead.

If your organization still treats resilience as a cost, it may be time to rethink: the real cost is in ignoring it.

Posts Relacionados

Informação de valor para construir o seu negócio.
Leia as últimas notícias em nosso blog.

Banco Master: the largest settlement of SFN and the real alert for governance, risks and compliance.

The fall of Banco Master confirms: GRC without integration is a real risk.

Banco Master: the largest settlement of SFN and the real alert for governance, risks and compliance.

The fall of Banco Master confirms: GRC without integration is a real risk.

Third-party security, comprehensive responsibility: lessons from the gol/smiles case for RCMP leaders.

The Smiles case shows how third parties expose companies to real risks. See how RCMP leaders should react.

Third-party security, comprehensive responsibility: lessons from the gol/smiles case for RCMP leaders.

The Smiles case shows how third parties expose companies to real risks. See how RCMP leaders should react.

Identity governance: the new boundary between secure companies and the next victims

The absence of identity governance is a risk. Find out how the Oracle transforms that scenario.

Identity governance: the new boundary between secure companies and the next victims

The absence of identity governance is a risk. Find out how the Oracle transforms that scenario.

Veja todas as postagens →

Acesse o Blog

Falar com um especialista Vennx
Falar com um especialista Vennx